RE: BGP Next Hop issue

From: Liu Jianxin-qch1927 (Jianxin.Liu@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Dec 14 2001 - 00:57:25 GMT-3


   
>OSPF between R1 and R3 and rest of the network.
???????????
What the meaning?

R1-r2 run OSPF?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ravi [mailto:s_ravichandran@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:44 AM
To: Menga, Justin; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: BGP Next Hop issue

RIP is running between R2 and R3
OSPF between R1 and R3 and rest of the network.
Redistribution is not done at R2 so no IGP between R1 and R3

Regards,
Ravi
----- Original Message -----
From: Menga, Justin <Justin.Menga@Compaq.com>
To: Ravi <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:31 PM
Subject: RE: BGP Next Hop issue

If you are using an IGP between R1, R2, and R3 then you can configure
networks advertised from R3 as backdoor routes. This increases the
administrative distance for the networks to 200 and allows the IGP
routes to be used over the EBGP routes..

E.g.

192.168.1.0/24 is behind R3...

On R1:

router bgp 3310
  network 192.168.1.0 backdoor

Regards,
Justin

-----Original Message-----
From: Ravi [mailto:s_ravichandran@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 14 December 2001 3:40 p.m.
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: BGP Next Hop issue

Hi,

How to change the next hop in the following scenario,

R1-----R2----------R3

R1connected to R2, R2 is connected to R3, R3 has ip connectivity to R1
not thru R2.

R3 advertises some routes to R2 and R1 from another AS, with next hop
self. R2 has no problem to go to next hop R1. R1 sees the next hop of
R3, As R1 can not reach R3 via R2, it takes a longer route to reach R3.

I would like R1 to see the next hop R2 to go to the networks advertised
by R3. Is it possible to change the next hop??? I think confederation
could be a possibility? is there any other way ????????

Thanks...



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:43 GMT-3