OT - 2509 vs. 2511

From: Beamish, Richard (Richard.Beamish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Dec 05 2001 - 09:50:29 GMT-3

• Next message: pimmo@xxxxxxxxxx: "OT: Lab Swap"
• Previous message: Waters, Kivas (UK72): "RE: DLSW Peer > DLSW Peer"
• Next in thread: Parrish, Ben: "RE: OT - 2509 vs. 2511"
• Maybe reply: Parrish, Ben: "RE: OT - 2509 vs. 2511"
• Maybe reply: Brian Dennis: "RE: OT - 2509 vs. 2511"
• Maybe reply: Jason1: "Re: OT - 2509 vs. 2511"
• Maybe reply: Brian Dennis: "RE: OT - 2509 vs. 2511"
• Maybe reply: Christopher M. Heffner: "RE: OT - 2509 vs. 2511"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Need to verify that the only difference between a 2509 and 2511
(w/octopus cables) is the actual octopus cable.

Thanks

                Dick Beamish
                Getronics Government Solutions

                richard.beamish@getronicsgov.com
Cell: 301.806.4280

• Next message: pimmo@xxxxxxxxxx: "OT: Lab Swap"
• Previous message: Waters, Kivas (UK72): "RE: DLSW Peer > DLSW Peer"
• Next in thread: Parrish, Ben: "RE: OT - 2509 vs. 2511"
• Maybe reply: Parrish, Ben: "RE: OT - 2509 vs. 2511"
• Maybe reply: Brian Dennis: "RE: OT - 2509 vs. 2511"
• Maybe reply: Jason1: "Re: OT - 2509 vs. 2511"
• Maybe reply: Brian Dennis: "RE: OT - 2509 vs. 2511"
• Maybe reply: Christopher M. Heffner: "RE: OT - 2509 vs. 2511"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:38 GMT-3