From: David Bader (David.Bader@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Dec 04 2001 - 15:43:16 GMT-3
Hi group
Big problem !!!
140.200.1.0/24 |---R1
|
130.1.1.0/24 |
|
R2----R3---| 140.200.2.0/24
130.1.2.0/24
This problem is a little bit tricky to understand. R2 and R3 are running
OSPF between them and on R3's Lan. R1 and R2 are running IGRP between each
other and on R1's Lan. R2 is mutually redistributing between OSPF and IGRP.
Now to the Problem: the 140.200.2.0/24 gets redistributed as 140.200.0.0/16
on R2. The route comes to R1 but is rejected because it has already a route
from the same major net in its routing table
(http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/54.html). The other way 140.200.1.0/24
gets advertised as 140.200.0.0/16 to R2 and is installed in R2's routing
table and in R3's routing table too because of redistribution. So, R3 has a
route to R1 (140.200.0.0/16), but R1 has no route back.
How can i solve this problem without using static routes?
any ideas?
regards dave
David Bader / Systems Engineer / NOS
-------------------------------------------------------------------
ECON!S AG / eBusiness Solutions
- Electronic Business Solutions
- Network and Office Solutions
- Consulting and Projectmanagement
Neumattstrasse 7 / CH 8953 Dietikon / Switzerland
Phone ++41 (0) 1 744 73 73
Direct ++41 (0) 1 744 73 25
Fax ++ 41 (0) 1 744 73 99
<mailto:david.bader@econis.com>
<http://www.econis.com/>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:37 GMT-3