From: Duy Nguyen (net_port@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Dec 03 2001 - 12:33:36 GMT-3
Since we are on this topic, what's the reason for the broadcast statement at
the end after the frame mapping? To broadcast the local dlci to remote? Or
to broadcast the local to the local? I've had a situation where the local
int couldn't ping itself even with broadcast statement. One router out of 5
that doesn't pick up pings on its own int. Debug shows encap failed. All
routers has same conf.
Absolutely Positively Continuously Sincerely,
Duy Nguyen CCNP
net_port@hotmail.com
Cell (817) 707-7451
>From: "McCallum, Robert" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>
>Reply-To: "McCallum, Robert" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>
>To: "'???'" <tonyblair@etang.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: two commands comparison
>Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 12:56:19 -0000
>
>technically speaking nothing will matter if you do both, however in my
>opinion if you did this in the lab exam then I (again personally) would
>give you no points for this. When you do a map it binds the dlci to the
>interface exactly the same way in doing you frame in dlci number does. The
>same
>goes for the broadcast statement on the maps. If its not needed and it is
>put in then again I would give no points for it.
>HTH
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: tonyblair@etang.com [mailto:tonyblair@etang.com]
>Sent: 03 December 2001 12:33
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: two commands comparison
>
>
>hi all,
>
>router(config-if)#frame-relay interface dlci 25
>router(config-if)#frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.1 25
>
>
>what is the association between them,i remembered that they were exclusive
>to each other,right?
>what if I config both of them on the same interface?
>
>Many Thanks.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:36 GMT-3