Cat 5000 module x5224 or x5224r

From: BryaninRichmond (bryaninrichmond@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Dec 03 2001 - 11:59:31 GMT-3

• Next message: SFeldberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: Router-ID"
• Previous message: SFeldberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: Encapsulation Failed"
• Next in thread: Asbjorn Hojmark: "RE: Cat 5000 module x5224 or x5224r"
• Maybe reply: Asbjorn Hojmark: "RE: Cat 5000 module x5224 or x5224r"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Group,

I've got a Cat 5000 with a Sup II but no port modules. I have the oportunity
to buy a ws-x5224 on the cheap. It has no fast ether channel capabilities.

My question is, should I spend more $$$$ for a ws-x5224R with fast
etherchannel or go with the simpler ws-5224? The difference is about 600
dollars. I wouldn't have another switch to channel to.

Bryan

• Next message: SFeldberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: Router-ID"
• Previous message: SFeldberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: Encapsulation Failed"
• Next in thread: Asbjorn Hojmark: "RE: Cat 5000 module x5224 or x5224r"
• Maybe reply: Asbjorn Hojmark: "RE: Cat 5000 module x5224 or x5224r"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:36 GMT-3