RE: What happens when access-list is applied on main interface ra ther than subninterface for FR?

From: Courtney Alexander Foster (cfoster@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Dec 02 2001 - 13:32:26 GMT-3


   
There is only one way to find out. But...my bet is that it would still
work...when the ip input process detects incomimg packet if there is a
filter set I think the packet goes put through the filter before it hit
the logical/sub interfaces.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Waters, Kivas (UK72)
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 7:19 AM
To: Albert Lu; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: What happens when access-list is applied on main interface
ra ther than subninterface for FR?

I agree Albert, as far as I know, only apply IP ACL's to interfaces with
an IP address configured. If the major interface was configured with
subinterfaces and no FR DLCI's or ATM VC's were associated with the
major interface then applying an IP ACL to that major interface would
not achieve anything.

regards

Ki

-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Lu [mailto:albert_ccie@yahoo.com]
Sent: 02 December 2001 08:35
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: What happens when access-list is applied on main interface
rather than subninterface for FR?

So what do you guys think? I would think that the access-list would not
be used, since for FR, you wouldn't put an IP address on the main
interface, so access-lists that filter out IP would not work.

Albert



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:36 GMT-3