From: John Neiberger (neiby@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Nov 24 2001 - 19:48:31 GMT-3
Okay, I tried that and it still does not work. I thought about your
suggestion and I think I know where you're going with it. Are you thinking
that the addition of that command would cause the bits to be swapped twice?
I've been playing some more with the SR/TLB config and I haven't been able
to make it work yet. I've added multiring IP to both token ring interfaces
and that didn't seem to help.
My next thought is to configure RSRB with direct encapsulation (since I have
ip routing turned off and no ip addresses on R2 or R3.) Then I could put
the SR/TLB config on R3 instead of R2 and see if that makes a difference.
It still seems to me that I'm close to making this existing config work, but
the solution eludes me.
Thanks,
John
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001 13:45:26 -0500, Nigel Taylor wrote:
| John,
| Remove the configuration line "bridge 20
bitswap-layer3-addresses"
| and then try it...
| What happens? Does it work? If so can, you explain why? Want to know..
!
|
| -Nigel
|
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "John Neiberger" <neiby@excite.com>
| To: "fwells12" <fwells12@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
| Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 11:55 AM
| Subject: Re: Transparent Bridging IP from TR to ETH over Serial
|
|
| > Okay,here is the config of R2. R1 and R4 simply have IP addresses
| assigned,
| > and R3 is transparent bridging from serial to ethernet.
| >
| > no ip routing
| > !
| > source-bridge ring-group 200
| > source-bridge transparent 200 300 1 20
| > !
| > interface Serial0
| > no ip address
| > no ip route-cache
| > no ip mroute-cache
| > no fair-queue
| > clockrate 64000
| > bridge-group 20
| >
| > interface TokenRing0
| > no ip address
| > no ip route-cache
| > no ip mroute-cache
| > ring-speed 16
| > source-bridge 10 1 200
| > !
| > bridge 20 protocol ieee
| > bridge 20 bitswap-layer3-addresses
| >
| > This is the current config but I've tried other configs to no avail.
| After
| > I get some coffee I'm going to try to think this through again. I have
a
| > feeling there is a problem with my thought process and I'll have to be
| awake
| > to spot it. :-)
| >
| > Thanks,
| > John
| >
| > On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 22:07:56 -0800, fwells12 wrote:
| >
| > | Show us your configs...
| > |
| > | ----- Original Message -----
| > | From: "John Neiberger" <neiby@excite.com>
| > | To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
| > | Cc: <elouie@yahoo.com>
| > | Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 9:43 PM
| > | Subject: Transparent Bridging IP from TR to ETH over Serial
| > |
| > |
| > | > I'm having trouble configuring this and it seem that there ought
to
| be
| > a
| > | way
| > | > to do this. Here is the scenario:
| > | >
| > | > R1----(t/r)-----R2---(serial)---R3 ----(eth)---- R4
| > | >
| > | > IP routing is turned off on R2 and R3. I'm attempting to
| transparently
| > | > bridge IP from the t/r segment to the ethernet segment and I'm
| failing
| > | > miserably.
| > | >
| > | > I've tried a few different things with no success. At the moment
I'm
| > | > playing with SR/TLB on R2, but usually that involves T/R to Eth
| > conversion
| > | > on the same router, right? In this case it's T/R to serial and
this
| > isn't
| > | > working so far.
| > | >
| > | > If I wasn't trying to bridge IP I could use DLSw, but I don't see
how
| I
| > | > could use that here.
| > | >
| > | > I should mention that this isn't part of a lab scenario, I just
| wanted
| > to
| > | > see if I could do it.
| > | >
| > | > Any thoughts? I think I'm going to give up for the evening and
try
| > again
| > | > tomorrow when I can actually think clearly. <g>
| > | >
| > | > Thanks,
| > | > John
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:22 GMT-3