From: Chua, Parry (Parry.Chua@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Nov 19 2001 - 04:41:29 GMT-3
In reference to Jeff doyle Routing Tcp/Ip Vol 1 Ch9 (pg 561) indicate if
you connection are dynamic (ie FR SVC or ATM SVC) and has some examples
Parry Chua
-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Garcia Legada [mailto:nlegs@visto.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:07 PM
To: bhescock@cisco.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com;
ohanusi@lagos.sns.slb.com
Subject: Re: OSPF Point-to-Multipoint 'non-broadcast' keyword
Normal point-to-multipoint doesnt have DR/BDR also right ??? Why need to
use the 'non-broadcast' keyword ???
Neil
From: Brian Hescock bhescock@cisco.com Add to Address Book Block this
Sender Display Headers Printer-Friendly Version
To: nlegs@visto.com Cc:
Subject: Re: OSPF Point-to-Multipoint 'non-broadcast' keyword Sent:
11/18/2001 15:49
no DR/BDR election, a big plus.
B.
-----Original Message-----
From: ohanusi anthony ohanusi@lagos.sns.slb.com
Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 16:54:00 -0800
To: nlegs@visto.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OSPF Point-to-Multipoint 'non-broadcast' keyword
it allows you to specify the cost for each neighbor therefore you can
manipulate the route.
Regards
At 06:59 AM 11/18/2001, Neil Garcia Legada wrote:
>Hi Group,
>
>Anybody tried using the 'non-broadcast' keyword when configuring 'ip
ospf
>network point-to-multipoint' ??? It say's in the doc CD that 'neighbor'
>statement is necessary for this type of OSPF network to work. Just
curious
>as to when should one use this option and to what advantage ???
>
>Appreciate any feedback.
>
>Thanks and regards,
>Neil
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:18 GMT-3