From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Nov 19 2001 - 12:48:38 GMT-3
Neil,
Here's a url:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios113ed/113aa/113aa_2
/58cfeats/ospfpmp.htm
B.
Neil Garcia Legada wrote:
> Normal point-to-multipoint doesnt have DR/BDR also right ??? Why need to use
the 'non-broadcast' keyword ???
>
> Neil
>
> From: Brian Hescock bhescock@cisco.com Add to Address Book Block this Send
er Display Headers Printer-Friendly Version
> To: nlegs@visto.com Cc:
> Subject: Re: OSPF Point-to-Multipoint 'non-broadcast' keyword Sent: 11/18/200
1 15:49
>
>
> no DR/BDR election, a big plus.
>
> B.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ohanusi anthony ohanusi@lagos.sns.slb.com
> Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 16:54:00 -0800
> To: nlegs@visto.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: OSPF Point-to-Multipoint 'non-broadcast' keyword
>
> it allows you to specify the cost for each neighbor therefore you can
> manipulate the route.
> Regards
>
> At 06:59 AM 11/18/2001, Neil Garcia Legada wrote:
> >Hi Group,
> >
> >Anybody tried using the 'non-broadcast' keyword when configuring 'ip ospf
> >network point-to-multipoint' ??? It say's in the doc CD that 'neighbor'
> >statement is necessary for this type of OSPF network to work. Just curious
> >as to when should one use this option and to what advantage ???
> >
> >Appreciate any feedback.
> >
> >Thanks and regards,
> >Neil
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:18 GMT-3