Re: rip equal cost load balancing (my correction!)

From: Rthugo1@xxxxxxx
Date: Tue Nov 13 2001 - 21:14:41 GMT-3


   
In a message dated 11/13/01 6:12:36 PM Central Standard Time, Rthugo1 writes:

<< Subj: Re: rip equal cost load balancing
 Date: 11/13/01 6:12:36 PM Central Standard Time
 From: Rthugo1
 To: dhuskey@xnet.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com

 In a message dated 11/12/01 10:50:19 PM Central Standard Time,
dhuskey@xnet.com writes:

 << Subj: rip equal cost load balancing
  Date: 11/12/01 10:50:19 PM Central Standard Time
  From: dhuskey@xnet.com (dhuskey)
  Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
  Reply-to: dhuskey@xnet.com (dhuskey)
  To: ccielab@groupstudy.com

A CORRECTION: 6 paths MAX, the default is 4. and, yes, it is enabled by
default.
RH

 David,
 It equal cost load balances over a maximum of 4 paths. Use the
"maximum-paths" command under router rip to choose the # of paths to balance
over. Also, using the "ip route-cache" command influences the way it will
load balance:
 *with "ip route-cache" enabled, it will load balance per-destination
 *with "ip route-cache" disabled, it will load balance per packet
 HTH,
 Rob H. NP, DP, blah,blah,blah...........

  It is my understanding that RIP does equal cost load balancing.
  i can't find any information on this feature.

  does anyone know how many equal cost paths that RIP supports?
  and whether or not you can turn off this feature?
  is it enabled by default?

  thanks in advance,
  David



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:15 GMT-3