From: fwells12 (fwells12@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Nov 13 2001 - 16:56:29 GMT-3
Vincent is correct. I just verified the docs. Interestingly, ethernet is
actually definable in the port-list statement. You would have thought
Cisco would have not allowed one to input incorrect paramenters into the
command...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vincent Zhang" <vincentzhang@yahoo.com>
To: "Daniel Hong" <Daniel.Hong@nec.com.au>; "'fwells12'"
<fwells12@hotmail.com>; "Charles Huang" <CharlesNY2000@yahoo.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:59 AM
Subject: Re: dlsw port-list and ring-list
> Checked it back, Yes, port-list doesnot work on etherent port now, use
> bridge group.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Hong" <Daniel.Hong@nec.com.au>
> To: "'fwells12'" <fwells12@hotmail.com>; "Charles Huang"
> <CharlesNY2000@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 5:46 PM
> Subject: RE: dlsw port-list and ring-list
>
>
> > I don't think port-list will work on ethernet port, but it will work on
> bridge group interface. Can someone correct it if I'm wrong.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fwells12 [mailto:fwells12@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: 13/11/2001 8:19
> > To: Charles Huang; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: dlsw port-list and ring-list
> >
> >
> > Ring lists can only allow traffic to Token-Ring interfaces. Port lists
> can
> > do both ethernet and T.R.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Charles Huang" <CharlesNY2000@Yahoo.Com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:42 PM
> > Subject: dlsw port-list and ring-list
> >
> >
> > > can anyone tell me the difference between the two ?
> > > Doc CD gave the same definition.
> > > are they suppose to be the same ?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Charles
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:14 GMT-3