From: Larson, Chris (Contractor) (Chris.Larson@xxxxxx)
Date: Fri Nov 09 2001 - 16:40:13 GMT-3
Yes.
When you use the neighbor statement it will send a unicast to that neighbor,
as well as continue to broadcast out the other interfaces participating in
RIP.
Using the passive-interface command prevents rip from being advertised on
the particular interface you set to be passive.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ouellette, Tim [mailto:tim.ouellette@eds.com]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:20 PM
To: 'Richard Foltz'; ccielab
Subject: RE: Rip Neigbor statment
So basically with the passive-interface set, it won't send the broadcasts
but if you have the neighbour defined it'll still send out the unicast to
those defined hosts whether passive is there or not? Does this sound right?
Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Foltz [SMTP:ccie2b@rfoltz.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:37 PM
> To: RB; ccielab
> Subject: Re: Rip Neigbor statment
>
> it wont if you have made the interface passive. If its not passive, then
> it
> will still send the broadcasts.
>
> Richard Foltz, CCIE#8339, CCNP-Voice, CCDP, MCSE+I, Network+, A+
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "RB" <slowgo@home.com>
> To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:27 PM
> Subject: Rip Neigbor statment
>
>
> > I know that the neigbor statement in rip sends out unicast updates to
> that
> > neighbor, but does it also send no other updates? Let's say you had
> several
> > routers on an ethernet segment with RIP running, and you used a neigbor
> > statement from a-b, does c no longer receive rip updates from a?
> > Thanks,
> >
> > RBI
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:11 GMT-3