From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Oct 20 2001 - 16:47:28 GMT-3
12.1(6) and 12.2(3) redistribute the directly connected interface into
ospf (I just tried it also) but in 11.2(24) it doesn't (which should be
how it works). It could either be a change in behavior in IOS but far
more likely it's a bug in the newer code. We redistribute from the
routing table and in the routing table it's known as a "connected"
route, not a "rip" route so redistribution from rip into ospf shouldn't
occur for that network. There's probably already a known bug out there
but I'll check later.
Brian
Khalid Nafie wrote:
>Dear all,
> During my study in the redistribution i found this situation and i
>need ur feed back,
>if u have router like this (S0)--[R1]--(E0)--
> |
> (S1)
>
> If S0,E0 running under OSPF, and S1 under RIP if u try to redistrib
>mutually, u'll find that the directly connected networks dosen't
>redistributed from ospf into ripas if the router dose't conceder it as ospf
>networks, but rip will distribute into ospf even the directly connected
>networks.
>DOES ANY ONE FIND SOMETHING FAMILIAR TO THIS?
>TAKE A LOOK TO THE BOOTCAMP (7) TO ROUTER NO.2 IT DOESN'T REDISTRIBUTE THE
>E0 NETWORK INTO RIP.
>================================================
>Yours,
>Khaled Nafie
>Network Engineer
>Customer Services
>MCSE,CCDP,CCNP VOICE ACCESS
>NCR Corporation, Kuwait
>Mob.: +965-9872046
>Tel : +965- 2412201, 2412203
>Fax : +965-2413075
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:22 GMT-3