From: Mas Kato (loomis_towcar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Oct 16 2001 - 02:43:44 GMT-3
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
Didn't 12.2 have its basis in RFC 2795? If it did, some of the features could h
ave been introduced somewhere in the 12.1T-train and might be fair game...
>Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 14:28:31 -0400
> Rodgers Moore <rodgers@the-moores.org> Wojtek Iwanczyk <wiwanczyk@tec-adv.com
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Re: OT: RFC2324 / RFC2325 on the lab ???Reply-To: Rodgers Moore <rodgers@the-
moores.org>
>
>More importantly, are RFC 1149 & RFC 2549 still tested? And, if all four
>might be tested together - in conjunction? I am of the personal opinion
>that the two sets of specifications are not compatible in any way. What do
>you think?
>
>Rodgers Moore, CCIE# 8153
>
>Wojtek Iwanczyk wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know if any RFC2324 / RFC2325are to be tested on the new
>> CCIE lab exam ?
>> thanx and any response is much appreciated , i hope im not violarion NDA
>> ..
>> Wojtek Iwanczyk
>--
>Rodgers Moore, CCIE #8153, CCNP-Security, CCDP
>Design and Security Consultant
------------------------------------------------------------
Speed Racer's Official Virtual Pit Stop.
http://www.speedracerdsl.com/speedracer/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:20 GMT-3