From: John Neiberger (neiby@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Oct 15 2001 - 11:28:02 GMT-3
What does the metric look like on your peer routers? Are they seeing the
888?
I haven't played with this yet in my home lab, but it seems to me that the
effect of redistributing OSPF routes into BGP with the metric set might not
be seen on the router where the redistribution occurs. Wouldn't it only
show up on the routers to which it advertises BGP routes?
Then again, if BGP peer is going to advertise a route to another peer, that
route would have to show up in the BGP table first, right? And if it's in
the table, then in this case it got there because of redistribution and
should have the metric set correctly. Hmmm...
I'll have to play with this when I get home to see what happens.
Regards,
John
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001 20:30:33 -0700 (PDT), Paul Loh wrote:
| Question: When redistributing OSPF to BGP, even if I
| specify a metric of 888 in the command "redistribute
| ospf 1 metric 888 route-map OspfToBgp", how come the
| metric is not reflected in the BGP table?
|
|
|
| !
| router ospf 1
| redistribute connected metric 15 subnets route-map
| Connected
| redistribute bgp 2 metric 10 subnets route-map
| BgpToOspf
| network 137.20.64.6 0.0.0.0 area 0
| network 137.20.224.6 0.0.0.0 area 0
| network 137.20.60.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
| !
| router bgp 2
| redistribute ospf 1 metric 888 route-map OspfToBgp
| network 137.20.86.0 mask 255.255.255.0
| neighbor 137.20.25.1 remote-as 2
| neighbor 137.20.25.1 update-source Loopback0
| neighbor 137.20.25.1 next-hop-self
| neighbor 137.20.86.1 remote-as 1
| neighbor 137.20.86.1 default-originate
| no auto-summary
|
|
|
| r6#sb
| BGP table version is 15, local router ID is
| 137.20.60.1
| Status codes: s suppressed, * valid, > best, i -
| internal
| Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
|
| Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf
| Weight Path
| *>i0.0.0.0 137.20.25.1 0 100
| 0 i
| * i137.20.10.0/24 137.20.25.1 0 100
| 0 i
| *> 137.20.64.5
| 32768 ?
| *> 137.20.20.0/24 137.20.64.5
| 32768 ?
| *> 137.20.25.0/24 137.20.64.5
| 32768 ?
| *> 137.20.40.16/28 137.20.64.5
| 32768 ?
| *> 137.20.86.0/24 0.0.0.0 0
| 32768 i
| *> 137.20.100.32/27 137.20.64.5
| 32768 ?
| *> 137.20.200.16/28 137.20.64.5
| 32768 ?
| *> 137.20.240.1/32 137.20.64.5
| 32768 ?
| *>i172.168.70.0/24 137.20.25.1 170 100
| 0 3 i
| *> 172.168.80.0/24 137.20.86.1 0
| 0 1 i
| *> 200.200.100.1/32 137.20.64.5
| 32768 ?
| *> 200.200.200.1/32 137.20.64.5
| 32768 ?
| r6#
|
| Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance.
|
| Paul
|
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:19 GMT-3