From: Diehm, Brian (Brian.Diehm@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Oct 14 2001 - 19:19:01 GMT-3
Am I correct in my thinking about DLSW peer groups. The way I
understand it is spokes only have to be set to promiscuous and the hub
has the remote peer statement.
Do I need to have a remote peer statement on R2 to R3 to get this to
work correctly? I know the point of this is to break of the full mesh
so to speak. But is that only true between border peers and not with in
the groups themselves?
Example
Border
R1
/ \
/ \
R2 R3
hostname r1
!
!
dlsw local-peer peer-id 100.0.0.1 group 1 border
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 100.0.0.2
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 100.0.0.3
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 100.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
hostname r2
!
dlsw local-peer peer-id 100.0.0.2 group 1 promiscuous
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 100.0.0.2 255.255.255.255
hostname r3
!
dlsw local-peer peer-id 100.0.0.3 group 1 promiscuous
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 100.0.0.3 255.255.255.255
Thanks,
Brian D
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:18 GMT-3