Re: OSPF interface - a non related question

From: routerjocky (elouie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Oct 12 2001 - 20:57:55 GMT-3


   
> My personal habit is to use the individual host, so I can assure that no
> other interfaces are grabbed and put into the process. I have yet to
> see actual advantages for any either way that are backed with
> documentation.
>
> Bryan
>
>
[snip]
> Is one of the forms (the interface address specifically, the subnet it
> belongs to or a supernet/classful net) considered a better form/just
> better
> for any reason or is using any of them just as good.
>

more a matter of personal preference than anything else - so do whatever
works for you (and your team). I like using the host and associated
wildcard mask - it helps me remember what the actual mask for the network
should be when I'm troubleshooting. And, if for some reason I change the
host address (within the subnet), the network statement is still valid.

> Personally I find using the subnet the most intuitive as it is a
> 'network'
> statement so using a host there seems awkward and the classful one can
> match
> interfaces I don't want included in the same area, but I see not real
> reason
> why this would be better.
>
> Omer.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:18 GMT-3