From: Bryan Osoro (bosoro@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Oct 12 2001 - 20:25:49 GMT-3
My personal habit is to use the individual host, so I can assure that no
other interfaces are grabbed and put into the process. I have yet to
see actual advantages for any either way that are backed with
documentation.
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ben-Shalom, Omer
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 3:52 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OSPF interface - a non related question
regarding the below:
>>network 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 area 1, network 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.63 area 1,
or
>>network 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 1
>>
>>
>>
>>That should fix you right up
>>
>>
I am pretty certain all of the above will, indeed work fine as the idea
is
to get the interface considered in the OSPF domain.
Is one of the forms (the interface address specifically, the subnet it
belongs to or a supernet/classful net) considered a better form/just
better
for any reason or is using any of them just as good.
Personally I find using the subnet the most intuitive as it is a
'network'
statement so using a host there seems awkward and the classful one can
match
interfaces I don't want included in the same area, but I see not real
reason
why this would be better.
Omer.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:18 GMT-3