From: routerjocky (elouie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Oct 11 2001 - 14:41:17 GMT-3
is anyone having problems with demand circuit not suppressing hello's?
I can't keep my bri down even though sh ip ospf int shows that hellos are
suppressed. However, the dialer cause is a packet from the bri IP to
224.0.0.5
-e-
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Ezerski" <jezerski@broadcom.com>
To: "'Michael Le'" <michael.le@lendlease.com.au>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:01 AM
Subject: RE: weird things in IOS ?
> I too have noticed wierd things in 12.0.7T. In my case, it was an OSPF
> neighbor relationship with an ASBR. The way I do my OSPF commands is like
> this:
>
> router ospf 1
> network 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
>
> This lets me tightly control which interfaces participate in OSPF. I
spent
> the better part of 2 hours checking and double checking everything under
the
> sun, including reboots, process kills, even wiping that router....only to
> find that if I put the following, it worked:
>
> router ospf 1
> network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 (or other inverse variations)
>
> It seems that 12.07T doesn't like the "all zeroes" inverse mask in certain
> OSPF scenarios.
>
> -Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Michael Le
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:29 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: weird things in IOS ?
>
>
> Hi Group.
> IOS doesn't seem to like me lately (12.07T)
>
> a virtual link statement is only partially working
>
> show ip ospf vir(shows its up and happening) - so i tried
> Rebooting all the routers, clearing ospf processes etc ...
> Nothing worked, just had to remove the command and put it in again, works
> straight away ?
>
> I've experienced similliar things in isdn confguration also.
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Notice: This email is confidential and may contain copyright material of
> Lend Lease. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us
> immediately and delete all copies of this message. It is the
> responsibility of the recipient to virus scan this email.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:17 GMT-3