From: Daniel Prinsloo (daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:07:19 GMT-3
Daniel,
good evening. Some help on question one.
Here is a sample of my config that I got working:
ip nat pool real-hosts 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.126 prefix-length 24 type
rotary
ip nat inside destination list 2 pool real-hosts
!
interface serial0
ip address 192.168.1.129 255.255.255.224
ip nat outside
!
interface ethernet0
ip address 10.1.1.254 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
!
access-list 2 permit 10.1.1.127
Daniel Hong wrote:
> Hi Group;
>
> I have two questions on NAT, hope someone experienced similar problems and ca
n explain this strange NAT behavior.
>
> First, Does NAT TCP load sharing/balancing work at all, I tried both CCO's a
nd Doyle's sample. Couldn't get them
>
> working. I used ver12.1(10) and 12.0(18) enterprise IOS.
>
>
> Second, I configured a IL to IG NAT by using a route map. The route map has
two match statements ( match source ip address and
>
> next hop ip add). I have to use no ip route-catch on all the interfaces to m
ake the NAT work. But if I have a single match statement,
>
> NAT will work at any switching mode. This is really strange. IOS bug???
>
>
> Thx in advance
>
> Daniel
-- Daniel Prinsloo Prove IT daniel@prove-it.co.uk www.prove-it.co.uk ICQ 42743324 Fax 0870 135 7712
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:15 GMT-3