From: Bob Dixon (bobdixon@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:51:16 GMT-3
I think that the lowest end product (cheapest) that you can get that
actually supports the "Crescendo-style" IOS (like the Cat 5000) and trunking
for "router-on-a-stick" configurations would be the 2901 with a 12-port
10/100 ethernet module. This is what was used in the ECP1 class in place of
the Cat 5000.
Thanks,
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: <jonatale@earthlink.net>
To: JJ Crump <RCrump@computertech.com>
Cc: David Knot <david_knot@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 3:19 PM
Subject: Re: Cat 2924XL vs Cat 2950
> dont get it, i made this mistake - the XL s/w is completely diff and is
not on
> the test per the equip list on web last time i check.
>
>
> JJ Crump wrote:
>
> > I believe they use the same IOS as in the XL series(2924XL, 3500XL,
etc).
> > They do not use the 1900 menu based or catalyst set-based command sets.
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat2950/index.htm
> >
> > Hope that helps,
> >
> > Ralph (JJ) Crump
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Knot [mailto:david_knot@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 9:54 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: OT: Cat 2924XL vs Cat 2950
> >
> > Hi guys
> >
> > Can anyone tell me if Cat 2924XL have the same IOS as
> > the new Cat 2950. I know for example Cat 1912 IOS
> > syntax is different from Cat 2924XL.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > David
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:15 GMT-3