From: Robert Dubell (bobdu11@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Oct 08 2001 - 15:08:54 GMT-3
Yes, both are IOS based switches, the biggest difference is port density and
also 3500's are not capable of running ATM Uplink modules, only Gig uplink
modules in the 3548......great switch.....Bobdu1
-----Original Message-----
From: David Knot <david_knot@yahoo.com>
To: jonatale@earthlink.net <jonatale@earthlink.net>; JJ Crump
<RCrump@computertech.com>
Cc: David Knot <david_knot@yahoo.com>; ccielab@groupstudy.com
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: Monday, October 08, 2001 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: Cat 2924XL vs Cat 2950
>I know that lab doesn't test 2924XL or 3500XL. I'm not
>asking this for the lab (that is why OFF TOPIC - OT).
>The question is if I get a 3500XL will the commands be
>the same as on a 2924XL?
>
>
>--- jonatale@earthlink.net wrote:
>> dont get it, i made this mistake - the XL s/w is
>> completely diff and is not on
>> the test per the equip list on web last time i
>> check.
>>
>>
>> JJ Crump wrote:
>>
>> > I believe they use the same IOS as in the XL
>> series(2924XL, 3500XL, etc).
>> > They do not use the 1900 menu based or catalyst
>> set-based command sets.
>> >
>> >
>>
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat2950/index.htm
>> >
>> > Hope that helps,
>> >
>> > Ralph (JJ) Crump
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Knot [mailto:david_knot@yahoo.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 9:54 AM
>> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> > Subject: OT: Cat 2924XL vs Cat 2950
>> >
>> > Hi guys
>> >
>> > Can anyone tell me if Cat 2924XL have the same IOS
>> as
>> > the new Cat 2950. I know for example Cat 1912 IOS
>> > syntax is different from Cat 2924XL.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > David
>> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:15 GMT-3