From: Raj Galagali (raj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Oct 05 2001 - 20:47:38 GMT-3
POSIP has been much better than other technologies. Scaleable, robust
and yes more Vendors are supporting it.
/raj
Raj Galagali
Backbone Engineer (CCIE#8216)
Exodus Communications
212-220-5486(work)
US-3967,EU-8709,AP-4197
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Robert Dubell
wrote:
> Packet over Sonet is definately outbidding ATM these days. Cost is cheaper
> and POS is easier to work with....
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mas Kato <loomis_towcar@speedracer.com>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Date: Friday, October 05, 2001 6:19 PM
> Subject: Off-Topic: OC-12 Survey
>
>
> >[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
> >Sorry for the off-topic post, but I've heard from other forums and wanted
> to hear from others working "where the rubber meets the road."
> >
> >The Cisco 7xxx line supports at least three modes of transport at OC-12
> rates:
> >
> >DPT - Dynamic Packet Transport (proprietary, SONet-like)
> >ATM - UNI
> >POS - Packet over SONet
> >
> >I was just wondering what the state-of-the-moment preferred transports are
> when NSPs need to lob in an OC-12 into an enterprise or medium-to-large POP.
> At one point in time ATM OC-12c was the way to go, but there has certainly
> been a lot of buzz revolving around POS. What about DPT?
> >
> >I'd be curious to know what trends you all are seeing out there...
> >
> >Thanks in advance-
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Mas
> >
> >Mas Kato
> >https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------
> >Speed Racer's Official Virtual Pit Stop.
> >http://www.speedracerdsl.com/speedracer/
> >Having trouble posting? Read:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> Having trouble posting? Read:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
Having trouble posting? Read:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:14 GMT-3