From: Todd Veillette (tveillette@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Sep 09 2001 - 21:51:30 GMT-3
It should work. Are you distributing the .12 into IGRP
on the same interface as the .15? If not, maybe a /16
other interface? If so, maybe change the summary to
/21 and see if you can ping through from the .12.
If you can't probably a loop; need a distribute-list?
-Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: <James_Hawkins@computacenter.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 7:45 AM
Subject: OSPF Summary Address for E2 routes?
> Hi all,
>
> I am practising some redistribution scenarios and have found an issue that
> hopefully someone can shed some light on.
>
> I have redistributed route 133.33.12.0/30 from EIGRP into OSPF. The route
> appears on all OSPF routers as a type E2 which is what I would expect. I
am then
> redistributing OSPF into IGRP on another router. As IGRP is classful and
the
> redistribution router has directly connected 133.33.x.x networks with a
/24
> mask I configured the summary-address 133.33.12.0 255.255.255.0 command
under
> the OSPF process.
>
> The route is not redistributed into IGRP - can see this by using debug
IGRP
> transactions. Another /30 route 133.33.15.0 which is learnt directly
from OSPF
> - not redistributed into it from EIGRP - is redistributed into IGRP
successfully
> through the use of the summary-address 133.33.15.0 255.255.255.0
>
> Is it standard behaviour for OSPF that external routes cannot be
summarised when
> being redistributed into another protocol? Any ideas how to solve this?
>
> thanks
>
> James
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:16 GMT-3