From: Kyle Galusha (kgalusha@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Sep 09 2001 - 12:18:59 GMT-3
Guys,
ANy reason not to use CAR for this? I've seen this done is several
networks I work in.
Thanks,
Kyle
At 10:46 PM 9/8/2001 -0400, Thounda Craig, Jr. wrote:
>Cal, you're correct (if policy is to be broad - CBWFQ). NBAR allows you to
>be more granular as you described - should Sanjay look to control
>particular web apps. end-to-end.
>
>As will any QoS design, each ingress/egress point has to be in compliance
>w/policy in order to deliver required results.
>Note: either will work, just different approaches based on known items
>within the network. Of the two, CBWFQ is the simple method, NBAR requires
>detailed knowledge of the network.
>
>brgds,
>Thounda
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Cal Michael
>Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 10:11 PM
>To: 'Thounda Craig, Jr.'; 'sanjay'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Traffic Queueing
>
>- I guess I would disagree that NBAR is the correct
> IOS feature to implement in this case.
>
> NBAR normally requires CBWFQ to perform the type
> of filtering of network based prioritization you
> were looking for in your email.
>
> Though NBAR can provide many "content" based
> services, all you would need is to set up CBWFQ.
>
> Just remember that prioritizing Internet traffic
> is something you also need to implement with your
> ISP's help.
>
> Using a QoS method such as CBWFQ (using a standard
> ACL to specify source IP networks) works fine for
> outbound traffic (enterprise to ISP).
>
> However, you need to have the ISP implement a
> prioritization for traffic from the Internet (if
> you host anything - email, web, etc) or traffic
> from the Internet that is "return" traffic for
> a transaction an internal user initiated.
>
> Lastly, remember that the ISP has no idea what
> the RFC1918 addresses in your example belong to,
> they will need to prioritize the destination
> networks using public address(es).
>
>--- ----- ---
>
>---------------------------------------------
>- Cal Michael - Author www.solutionlabs.com -
>- CCIE R-S/ISP Dial #5033, CCDP, AVVID CIPT -
>- mailto:support@solutionlabs.com -
>---------------------------------------------
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Thounda Craig, Jr.
>Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 7:37 PM
>To: 'sanjay'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Traffic Queueing
>
>
>Yes, you can create a NBAR policy w/an ACL for the specified subnet.
>
>brgds,
>Thounda
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>Of
>sanjay
>Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 8:15 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Traffic Queueing
>
>Is there a way to allow for more bandwidth to one subnet then the other
>to access the internet? Lets say I have 2 subnets 10.10.10.0/24 and
>10.10.20.0/24. I want to give high priority to 10.10.10.0/24 subnet for
>accessing the internet.
>
>Any info is appreciated.
>
>-sanjay
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:15 GMT-3