From: ¾çö¿õ\ (y1700@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Sep 06 2001 - 22:33:32 GMT-3
I have installed the dlsw network in my customer's network.
i think your configuration seem to have a little wrong thinks.
i think that dlsw local peer 80.80.80.80 promis and no remote peer.
promiscuous means the accept the all connection to.
Actually in my customer's network, all netbios names are appeared. because netb
ios use the sap number F0 and F1.
And if you didn't use the lasp filter on your network to prevent the netbios, n
etbios name should be appeared on your router.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Church, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:13 AM
To: 'Fred Danson'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: DLSW + NetBIOS problem
Fred,
You're right. If the NetBIOS is encapsulated in IP, DLSW won't touch
it. DLSW only handles (I think) NetBeui and SNA.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Fred Danson
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:24 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW + NetBIOS problem
Hey Group,
I'm trying to transport NetBIOS from a Windows 2000 PC to a Win98 PC through
a
DLSW network. When I put the PCs on to the same ethernet segment, they are
able to find eachother, but they are not able to find eachother through the
DLSW network. Here's my setup
PC1 ----- R8 --------- R7 ----- PC2
PC1 is connected to R8 through ethernet.
PC2 is connected to R7 through ethernet.
R8 has an established DLSW connection to R7.
r8#show dlsw peer
Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
uptime
TCP 70.70.70.70 CONNECT 63 178 conf 0 0 0
00:30:1
Here are my configs:
R8-----------------------------------------------------
dlsw local-peer peer-id 80.80.80.80 promiscuous
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 70.70.70.70
dlsw bridge-group 1
!
interface Ethernet0
bridge-group 1
!
bridge 1 protocol ieee
r8#show dlsw reach
DLSw Local MAC address reachability cache list
Mac Addr status Loc. port rif
0006.3a43.8ace FOUND LOCAL TBridge-001 --no rif--
DLSw Remote MAC address reachability cache list
Mac Addr status Loc. peer
0006.3a2f.8ab8 FOUND REMOTE 70.70.70.70(2065)
DLSw Local NetBIOS Name reachability cache list
NetBIOS Name status Loc. port rif
DLSw Remote NetBIOS Name reachability cache list
NetBIOS Name status Loc. peer
R7---------------------------------------------------
dlsw local-peer peer-id 70.70.70.70 promiscuous
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 80.80.80.80
dlsw bridge-group 1
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
bridge-group 1
!
bridge 1 protocol ieee
r7#show dlsw reach
DLSw Local MAC address reachability cache list
Mac Addr status Loc. port rif
0006.3a2f.8ab8 FOUND LOCAL TBridge-001 --no rif--
DLSw Remote MAC address reachability cache list
Mac Addr status Loc. peer
0006.3a43.8ace FOUND REMOTE 80.80.80.80(2065)
DLSw Local NetBIOS Name reachability cache list
NetBIOS Name status Loc. port rif
DLSw Remote NetBIOS Name reachability cache list
NetBIOS Name status Loc. peer
I'm thinking that the NetBIOS traffic isn't being transported because it's
being run over TCP/IP instead of NetBEUI. Has anyone else encountered this
problem? Any Ideas?
Fred
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:15 GMT-3