From: Boris Bertelsons (info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 23 2001 - 04:07:29 GMT-3
Hi Guwb !
The main difference from a practical sight is:
When you use rotary-group, you have ONE Dialer Interface
for that very hardware interface. Therefore you'll need
dialer map statements if you want to connect to the remote
sites and you'll have to have them all in the same
IP subnets ...
When you use dialer pool, you can have many dialer interfaces
for your one physical interface. So this is more abstract,
because you build your virtual pools out of the physical
interfaces where a physical interface can belong to different
pools. With rotary-group you have just one strict defenition.
When you use dialer pool, you`ll have to configure one
Dialer Interface for every user that does call in...
That's the bad side of it. If you don't want to configure
each interface for every user individually you can use
a TACACS+ or RADIUS Server in connection with virtual templates.
But that's an other story :)
The course BCRAN does cover this in detail, sou you might want
to get a course book from cisco press or whom ever.
I hope this helps you in the basic differention between the
two. If not, please ask !
Kind regards,
Boris Bertelsons
CCIE #6373, CCDP, CCNP Security Specialist
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "weibing gu" <guwb@gd.bank-of-china.com>
Reply-To: "weibing gu" <guwb@gd.bank-of-china.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 9:57:43 +0800
>Hi.
>I want to ask a question that make me crazy. What is the different between dia
ler rotary-group and dialer pool? Which command can not apply to both interface
? Thanks.
>
> Guwb
> guwb@gd.bank-of-china.com
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:56 GMT-3