From: SALMON, MARK (SBMS) (MARK.SALMON@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2001 - 21:08:06 GMT-3
I have seen it is a related lab (IPsec) and they specified the outside
global addresses in the remote peer statements. This is especially true if
you do not have some kind of routing protocol running that identifies the
remote inside local address.
Mark Salmon
Sr. WAN Engineer Great Lakes Region
Cingular Wireless
2000 Ameritech Center Drive 3F07B
Hoffman Estates IL 60195
Voice: (847)765-3999
Pager: (847)992-0458
Email: mark.salmon@cingular.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Osoro [mailto:bosoro@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:35 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSw+ Question
Question about doing DLSw+ through NAT.
If you had a router behind NAT, what address would you specify in the
local-peer statement? Would you specify the "private, or inside local" ip
address, or would you specify the outside inside global, or public address?
I'm guessing it would just be the private IP, but I wanted other feedback.
i.e.
R1--DLSw---R2(NAT)------DLSwR3
On R1 would I specify the private IP as my local-peer ID, or the Public one
that will be statically assigned to it?
Thanks
Bryan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:55 GMT-3