From: Jason Sinclair (sinclairj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2001 - 21:09:05 GMT-3
Bryan,
You would use the inside local address. However please note the following
URL for problems with DLSW and NAT:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/6.html
<http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/6.html>
Regards,
Jason Sinclair
Team Leader - NSG
POWERTEL Limited
Level 11, 55 Clarence Street, SYDNEY
Phone: 61-2-8264-3820
Mobile: 0416 105 858
jasons@powertel.net.au
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Osoro [mailto:bosoro@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2001 08:35
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSw+ Question
Question about doing DLSw+ through NAT.
If you had a router behind NAT, what address would you
specify in the
local-peer statement? Would you specify the "private, or
inside local" ip
address, or would you specify the outside inside global, or
public address?
I'm guessing it would just be the private IP, but I wanted
other feedback.
i.e.
R1--DLSw---R2(NAT)------DLSwR3
On R1 would I specify the private IP as my local-peer ID, or
the Public one
that will be statically assigned to it?
Thanks
Bryan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:55 GMT-3