From: Ravi (s_ravichandran@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 14 2001 - 22:47:19 GMT-3
Tried already, it is not working.
Thanks,
Ravi
----- Original Message -----
From: YJC <stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>
To: Ravi <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>; Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: Distance command in EIGRP
> hi,
> pls try below,
> router eigrp 1
> distance 90 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 2
> access-list 2 permit 172.50.50.0 0.0.0.255
> pls tell me result.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ravi <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>
> To: Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Distance command in EIGRP
>
>
> > Jay,
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ethernet0 172.50.50.2/24
> > Serial0 172.60.60.2/24
> >
> > Serial interface participate in EIGRP routing process thru network
> command,
> > Ethernet is not. sh ip eigrp int shows only the serial interface. I did
> not
> > put network statement for 172,50.50 network, but is redistributed to
EIGRP
> > using redistribute connected command. So its distance is 170, thus other
> > routers choose ospf route to the 172.50.50.0 network. As you correctly
> said
> > if I use distance 90 90 OR distance 90 100, It solves the problem but it
> > changes the distance for all the external routes.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ravi
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net>
> > To: Ravi <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>
> > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 5:13 PM
> > Subject: Re: Distance command in EIGRP
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Ravi wrote:
> > >
> > > > You are very close to my problem.
> > > >
> > > > I wand to reduce the distance of a network 172.50.50.0 /24 . This
> > network is
> > > > directly connected to a EIGRP router. As there is no routing
protocol
> to
> > be
> > > > enabled for this network (limitation in a practice lab), I did
> > redistribute
> > > > connected. When it is redistributed to EIGRP, the distance is 170
for
> > this
> > > > network. The problem here is, all other network has the distance of
90
> > > > (EIGRP internal routes) but this network is with 170.
> > >
> > > It sounds like the 172.50.50.0/24, although connected to an EIGRP
> router,
> > > is not participating in EIGRP and thus being redistributed as an
> external
> > > connected network. Is 172.50.0.0 in your EIGRP network statement and
> does
> > > it show in "show ip eigrp interfaces"? If you don't want EIGRP
running
> on
> > > that interface you can always make it passive. Does including it in
the
> > > EIGRP process but making it passive violate your practice lab
> requirement?
> > >
> > > Another possibility is to change the administrative distance of all
> > > external routes along the lines of "(config-router)#distance eigrp 90
> 90",
> > > but this isn't recommended as it could break other things if there are
> > > other external networks you want to have at a larger distance. If
this
> > > is the only external network you're redistributing there, it makes no
> > > difference.
> > >
> > > Or, under the EIGRP routing process you could put
> > > "distance 90 172.50.50.0 0.0.0.255".
> > >
> > > > Another router learns this network from a OSPF router as its
distance
> is
> > > > only 110. So now this router chooses the ospf route as best route.
To
> > > > overcome this problem, I want to reduce the distance of this
network,
> in
> > > > otherwords, all the routers should learn this network thru EIGRP.
OSPF
> > > > should be second option. There are few work around to solve this
> > problem,
> > > > however, I was trying this method to fix.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - jay@west.net
> > > NetLojix Communications, Inc. - http://www.netlojix.com/
> > > WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:51 GMT-3