From: Jay Chandradas (jachandr@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 08 2001 - 15:05:39 GMT-3
I can think of one possiblity .
say you have
r1-------------------------------r2
r1 and r1 are running bgp. say you have , bunch of access list defined at
the out going port of r1 denying some traffic and permiting sone traffic and
lets say BGP is not a prt of the list. As you know implicy deny will deny
all the other routing protocols. So yout BGP will not work Ypu may have to
separately permit BGP to pass through.
hope this helps.
Jay
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Yang" <Richard.Yang@telus.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:29 AM
Subject: Update Access-list question
> Hi,
>
> I think my previous mail isn't clear the question, so sent it again.
>
> Hi ,
>
>
> I know this is to permit the bgp connection, but my question is which
> sitution I should use the num 1 access-list or num 2 access-list.
>
>
> 1 access-list 100 per tcp any eq 179 any
> access-list 100 per tcp any any eq 179
>
> or
>
> 2 access-list 100 per tcp any eq 179 any ge 1024
> access-list 100 per tcp any any eq 179
>
> Thanks,
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:47 GMT-3