OT: Re: Static Routes & Redundancy

From: Peter Van Oene (pvo@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 07 2001 - 13:43:17 GMT-3


   
and this relates to the ccielab how?

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 8/7/2001 at 5:33 PM Muhammed Omar wrote:

>Hi guys
>
>Can someone help with the following scenario:
>
>Setup:
>
>The client has 2 connections to 2 different ISPs & wants to establish
>redundancy in case of failure to any one ISP. Can't use any dynamic
>routing AT
>ALL (no BGP or RIP etc). Connection to ISP 1 is with a serial link router
>(L1)
>which in turn connects to another router via Ethernet (L2). L2's 2nd
>Ethernet
>goes into a Cat switch (S1). Connection to ISP 2 is also with another
>serial
>link router (R1) which in turn connects to another router via Ethernet
>(R2).
>R2's 2nd Ethernet goes into a Cat switch (S1). Into S1 we have another
>router
>(C1). C1's 2nd Ethernet is connected to user LAN.
>
>The Issue:
>
>How to achieve redundancy & possible load balance with static/default
>routes.
>
>So far in the lab I've tried to put 2 defaults on L1. The 2nd with higher
>AD
>pointing to R1 but this does not seem to work. Some packets make it out R1
>but
>the other half fail
>
>Please help!
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:46 GMT-3