From: afiddler (afiddler@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Aug 04 2001 - 13:21:00 GMT-3
You do not need the dialer theshold statement on both sides, as the called
router picks up when it is called, because it is called. The "dialer
load-threshold" is only relevant to the calling router.
Think of it as if you were calling another person. You have a reason for
calling that person, but that person answers the phone only because it is
ringing.
Note that, depending on where you live (in the U.S. if you are using DMS or
National switch types), you may need to define your SPIDs to include a local
directory number (LDN). If these numbers are left out, incoming calls will
not switch over to the second B channel. The LDN is the actual "telephone
number" within the SPID. This is the number without the "area code"
(usually three digits) or the trailing digits (unsually four). Example:
int bri0
isdn switch-type basic-ni
isdn spid1 41422233330101 2223333
isdn spid2 41422244440101 2224444
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Locke" <mi_locke@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 6:07 AM
Subject: ISDN/threshold sanity check
> Hi,
>
> This is a sanity check - I can't verify cause I have
> no equipment.
>
> You are doing an ISDN config and only one side has a
> dialer string - or only one side has a phone number
> and is able to dial, then .... you are are supposed to
> bring up the 2nd B channel if link utilization reaches
> 50%.
>
> The question is does the side that does not have the
> number in it's dialer map (therefore is unable to
> dial) need the dialer threshold statement? or would it
> be considered un needed and a reason to deduct points.
>
>
> thanks all,
> michael
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:45 GMT-3