From: Philip Guo (guo6688@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Aug 04 2001 - 00:44:53 GMT-3
I have same curious before. But now I find we do not need any route-map
here. Everything is fine. No loop here.
Phillip
>From: Rodrigo Espinha T Da Silva <rodrigo.silva@cpm.com.br>
>Reply-To: Rodrigo Espinha T Da Silva <rodrigo.silva@cpm.com.br>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: route maps to avoid loops during mutual redistribution
>Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 10:39:02 -0300
>
>Hi all,
>
> During my tests i have seen a lot of examples that when we have
>mutual redistribution betwen routing prot we need to aply route map to deny
>the networks send in the first redistribution process ,
>
>for example
>
>
> net 10.0.0.0 / rip --------r1---------net 172.16.0.0 / ospf
>
>redistribute rip to ospf ---ok
>when redistribute ospf to rip deny netw 10.0.0.0 with an route-map
>
> When we have more than one point of redistribution , we for sure
>need apply route-map to avoid loops , but when we have only one
>redistribution point we need to apply route-map? if yes, what is the rule
>to
>do it ? or for prevention is good always do these filters? any help?
>
>
>thanks
>
>Rodrigo E. Teixeira da Silva
>CPM Comunicacoes
>Analista de Suporte Tecnico
>CCNP Lan & Wan Certified.
>Phone: + 55-11-4196-0793
>Fax: + 55-11-4196-0900
>Call Dispach: 0800-117239
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:45 GMT-3