RE: BGP no-export vs. local-as

From: Jason Sinclair (sinclairj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Aug 03 2001 - 00:51:28 GMT-3


   
All,

Please disregard the last post.

Thanks,

Jason Sinclair
Team Leader - NSG
POWERTEL Limited
Level 11, 55 Clarence Street, SYDNEY
Phone: 61-2-8264-3820
Mobile: 0416 105 858
jasons@powertel.net.au

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Dan [mailto:dp595@optonline.net]
                Sent: Friday, 3 August 2001 13:43
                To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
                Subject: BGP no-export vs. local-as

                I got the following info from CCO:

        
(http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_
                r/iprprt2/1rdbgp.htm#xtocid142330

                excerpt:

                no-export-Routes with this community are sent to peers in
other
                sub-autonomous systems within a confederation. Do not
advertise this route
                to an EBGP peer. External systems are those outside the
confederation. If
                there is no confederation, an external system is any EBGP
peer.

                local-as -Send this route to peers in other sub-autonomous
systems within
                the local confederation. Do not advertise this route to an
external system.

        
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                ---------

                They both say the route gets advertised to peers in other
sub-autonomous
                systems.
                 But, I have always understood it as:

                A) If a route is tagged with the "no-export" community, it
will not be
                advertised to any EBGP peers, whether they be confederation
peers or not.

                B) If a router is tagged with the "local-as" community, it
will not be
                advertised to EBGP peers, except EBGP peers within the same
confederation.

                Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this
information on CCO
                regarding "no-export" contradicts itself.

                Dan Pontrelli
                Customer Installation/Support Engineer - Verio/NTT
                CCNP, MCSE, CNA
                **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**********************************************************************
This email (including all attachments) is intended solely for the named
addressee. It is confidential and may contain commercially sensitive
information. If you receive it in error, please let us know by reply email,
delete it from your system and destroy any copies.

This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced,
adapted or transmitted without the prior written consent of the copyright owner
.

Emails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects
and may not be successfully replicated on other systems. We give no
warranties in relation to these matters. If you have any doubts about
the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by us, please contact us
immediately.

**********************************************************************
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:44 GMT-3