From: Bob Chahal (bob.chahal@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 18 2001 - 06:17:24 GMT-3
Cliff,
In this scenario you can only have one routing protocol running and it must
be rip. The serial interfaces are point-to-point HDLC, so no NBMA issues
either.
thanks
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clifton Stewart" <cliftonlstewart@home.com>
To: "Bob Chahal" <bob.chahal@ntlworld.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 7:56 AM
Subject: IPX static saps
> Bob,
>
> Do you specifically have to configure RIP on the NBMA network? Are you
provided
> the option to just configure IPX and you chose RIP?
>
> Mainly because like you stated IPX-RIP can't have split-horizon disabled.
But
> IPX-EIGRP will automatically redistribute RIP routes residing on the LAN.
>
> -Cliff
>
> Bob Chahal wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question....
> >
> > A router (R1) that has its physical interfaces (s0, s1 and e0)
configured
> > for IPX RIP only. You are asked to configure two static saps. All other
> > routers in the network should be able to see these saps. How could you
get
> > this to work because the split horizon rule would prevent R1 from
sending
> > the sap broadcasts out of the interface you associate the static saps
to.
> >
> > i.e
> >
> > int e0
> > ipx network 1001
> > !
> > ipx sap 4 file 1001.0000.0000.0001 451 1
> >
> > This sap would not get advertised out of e0 and any attached routers
> > configured for IPX on the segment would not find out about this sap.
I've
> > tried a few things like using a different network and using static
routes
> > etc. I would usually configure an IPX network to a loopback and
associate
> > the sap to the loopback but in this case you are not allowed to
configure a
> > loopback.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Bob
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:26 GMT-3