From: Martin, Chris (chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 13 2001 - 13:21:18 GMT-3
Actually, corect me if im wrong but i think it would be:
access-list 10 deny 10.133.1.0 0.63.0.255
otherwise your statement is true.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Waskevich" <ciscokid@blinkx.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:52 AM
Subject: Accesslist question
> Question regarding accesslists see example:
>
> Deny the following with least number of lines:
>
> 10.133.1.0
> 10.197.1.0
> so i use
> access-list 10 deny 10.133.1.0 0.64.0.255
> is that right?
>
> because the second octet is exactly 64 apart so in binary
>
> 133--10000101
>
> 197--11000101
>
>
> that leaves the 2nd bit as the only "don't care" bit. I think it is but
> cannot find too much documentation on a scenario such as this
> Thanks in advance
>
> Lee
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:23 GMT-3