RE: Fatkid 441 Advanced DLSW

From: Khalid Nafie (knafie@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jun 12 2001 - 14:20:09 GMT-3


   
I want to add some input to ur mail regarding point 8, there is a mistake it
says R5 and R1 then implement it on different routers, beside i have one
question the solution consedering the bandwidth as 64k while the Frame relay
CIR is only 32k, i am confused to which value should we stick.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian [mailto:signal@shreve.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 9:41 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Fatkid 441 Advanced DLSW

Is it just me, or does Fatkid 441 have a way
of making your R4 (2513) goto 97% processor
load once its all complete. I guess DLSW
really can give a workout.........I have
double checked my configs, so I am pretty
sure this shouldn't just be me. I am running
12.0.17.

Some more comments about this lab. Step 8 says:

8. Configure prioritization between routers R5 and R1 such that SNA
traffic gets at least 50 percent of the available bandwidth sampled
every 0.125 seconds.

But in the solution it appears they did R1 to R2, rather than R1 to
R5..........

Also, step 9:

9. Configure prioritization between R1 and R4. This should prioritize
SNA Control data (SAP 04) and the response frames over other SNA
data. And all SNA data should be prioritized over other data.

I see on R4 where they defined the sap-priority-list, but I don't think
they applied it in the solution, I am assuming it should go on the token
interface.

How good of a DLSW lab is this would you all say? I am trying
to work on weak areas, and DLSW is one of them. I am looking
for more DLSW challenges, and if anyone knows sources
I am sure we could all use some.

Brian

-----------------------------------------------
Brian Feeny e:signal@shreve.net
CCNP+Voice/ATM/Security p:318.222.2638x109
CCDP f:318.221.6612
Network Administrator
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:22 GMT-3