From: Nodir Nazarov (nodir@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jun 09 2001 - 10:48:13 GMT-3
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Roman Rodichev wrote:
> Khalid, the "timeout 90" option (along with "keepalive 0") is a result of
> "dynamic" option. It has nothing to do with the task. These 3 options help
> DDR (along with "no-llc" and "inactivity"). Timeout 90 basically says
> "disconnect this peer if don't see keepalives for 90 seconds". So if a peer
> doesn't see acknowledgement for 90 seconds it will disconnect the remote
> peer.
>
> fatkid's solution is:
>
> dlsw timer sna-retry-interval 60
>
> And I'm sure he meant
>
> dlsw timer sna-retry-interval 45
If SNA achnowledgments for requests take *over* 45 sec as the task says I
think anything over 45 seconds is the right answer.
Nodir
>
> >From: Khalid Nafie <knafie@ncr.com.kw>
> >Reply-To: Khalid Nafie <knafie@ncr.com.kw>
> >To: BootCamp <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: FatKid Advanced DLSW
> >Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:19:32 +0300
> >
> >Hi guys,
> > I think the solution is not accurate in the poing #.7 when there is
> >old SNA system that takes over 45 second to respond on VLAN 2.
> >the answer is puting 90 second in the PEER statement, i dont know why.
> >I think the DLSW TIMER command should also be used to the configuration
> >#DLSW TIMER connect-timeout for. (XID negotiation timeout)
> >
> >
> >Please correct me if i am mistaken.
> >================================================
> >Yours,
> >Khaled Nafie
> >Network Engineer
> >Customer Services
> >MCSE,CCDP,CCNP VOICE ACCESS
> >NCR Corporation, Kuwait
> >Mob.: +965-9872046
> >Tel : +965- 2412201, 2412203
> >Fax : +965-2413075
> >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:21 GMT-3