From: garry baker (fallow46@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 06 2001 - 19:00:22 GMT-3
David,
I have come across exactly the same thing. I stopped
the far end from initiating a call be tying down th
dialer-list access-list. I was always under the
impression that if you didn't want the far end to make
a call just leave out the dialer string. Could it be
that 12.0 code does it a little differently to 11
code. i am pretty sure that with 11 code on 1603s you
don't need the renote dialer string in it for it to
work. Does anyone know??
Garry
--- David Anderson <dma@cisco.com> wrote:
> I have also ran into something interesting in the
> last couple of
> days....with only 2 weeks left from today until
> D-day
> I am using dialer map statements on my calling and
> receiving routers and
> have an interesting problem. On my calling router I
> have the following:
> R1---calling router
> int bri 0
> ip address 133.1.100.5 255.255.255.252
> encap ppp
> dialer map ip 133.1.100.6 name router2 broadcast
> 5552222
> dialer-group 1
>
> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
>
> R2----receiving router
> int bri 0
> ip address 133.1.100.5 255.255.255.252
> encap ppp
> dialer map ip 133.1.100.5 name router1 broadcast
> dialer-group 1
>
> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
>
> When I use the above configs the calling router is
> not able to ping the
> remote router. However if I add a dial string to
> the end of the dialer map
> on the receiving router the ping works fine. This
> is not what I am after
> though. I do not want to the receiving router to
> have a dial string,
> because I don't want it to be able to initiate a
> call.
> Any suggestions?
>
> Any input is appreciated.
> Thanks,
> David
>
> At 11:29 PM 6/5/2001 -0700, Daniel C. Young wrote:
> >Folks,
> >
> >Scenario:
> >I had one router with a dialer-group statement
> calling another router
> >without the dialer statement. Dialer map and ppp
> authentication were in
> >place. The call is placed, but no traffic can go
> through. Pings fail, no
> >route exchange. When I configured 'dialer-group' on
> the called router
> >WITHOUT a 'dialer-list' statement, the pings were
> successful and routing
> >tables were updated.
> >
> >Question:
> >Is a 'dialer-group' statement necessary in order to
> pass traffic through an
> >isdn line? Or, was this an IOS bug?
> >
> >List of equipment used:
> >ISDN Simulator: Emutel Solo
> >Calling router: 2503 with 12.0(5)T ED Enterprise
> with IPSec 56
> >Called router: 4500 with 12.0(17) GD Enterprise
> with F/W and IPSec 56
> >
> >Many thanks,
> >
> >Daniel C. Young
> >Sr. Network Engineer
> >CCNP (ATM, Security & Voice Specialist),
> >CCDP, CCSE, MCSE+I
> >
> >SBC Internet Data Center
> >(949) 221-1928 Work
> >(714) 350-8945 Cell
> >young@pobox.com
> >**Please
> read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please
> read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:19 GMT-3