From: Ron.Fuller@xxxxxx
Date: Thu May 31 2001 - 22:11:07 GMT-3
Are all 75 rings actual different rings? (Subnets, broadcast domains, SRB
rings...whatever?) Or are you looking at a smaller number of rings but it
looks like 75 once you consider the CRFs?
Anyways, we have a client with over 40 rings/interfaces on their RSM and
it works great. I would suggest not putting a whole lot more than that if
they are a busy network as the backplane in the switch could become
over-subscribed. Might be a good area for looking at
core/distribution/access design.
Just my .02 worth.
Ron Fuller, CCIE #5851, CCDP, CCNP-ATM, CSS Level 1, CCNP-Voice, MCNE
3X Corporation
rfuller@3x.com
"Henson, Charles" <CHenson@neteffectcorp.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
05/31/01 05:05 PM
Please respond to "Henson, Charles"
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
cc:
Subject: OT: Token Ring VLAN capacity to an RSM
Yes, some people still use token ring. Hypothetically, I have a building
with say...75 rings. I need to implement VLANS. Has anyone ever seen a
"per
RSM" limit on the number of VLANs that can be implemented. I can't find
anything on CCO. I've put a question into the TAC forum but have not
received a reply. If anyone knows and has a url or something to back it up
please reply offline
Charles Henson
<<Charles Henson Vcard (E-mail).vcf>>
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream
which had a name of Charles Henson Vcard (E-mail).vcf]
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:58 GMT-3