From: John Kaberna (jkaberna@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 20 2001 - 00:27:46 GMT-3
I think you are getting step 8 and step 11 confused.
Step 8 (cant used ip ospf network) - solved by used ip ospf hello-interval
Step 11 (cant use 2 frame maps on the spokes) - solved by using policy
routing
John Kaberna
CCIE #7146
NETCG Inc
www.netcginc.com
(415) 750-3800
Fax: 750-3900
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>
To: <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 7:51 PM
Subject: RE: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> People, am I being stupid? I will take a look at that lab on Tuesday. I
> clearly remember that they explicitly said not to use "ip ospf network"
> statement.
>
> Yes, you guys are right that we weren't allowed to use "frame map"
> statements on the spokes. And it's ok. That was not the point of the lab.
> The point was that we couldn't use "ip ospf network multipoint" statement,
> which would fix the entire scenario by creating /32 routes on the spokes
> pointing to the hub. So since we couldn't do it, we had to create policy
> routing that would send traffic to the hub manually.
>
> Am I right?
>
>
> >From: Martin Duggan <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>
> >Reply-To: Martin Duggan <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> >Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 21:40:14 +0100
> >
> >Hi Roman
> >
> >My understanding of Lab1 was that you policy route as you are not
permitted
> >to add multiple frame relay map statements from spoke to spoke, you
policy
> >route so that the next hop is actually your hub ( when attempting to
reach
> >a
> >spoke from a spoke )the hub is obviously aware of all spokes.
> >
> >Martin
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Roman Rodichev [mailto:rodic000@hotmail.com]
> >Sent: 19 May 2001 21:13
> >To: kenyeo@email.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> >
> >
> >Ken, policy routing should be used when you can't achieve certain task
with
> >the routing protocol you have or WAN technology you are using. And of
> >course, when you are asked to use it. Let's say you have multipoint
> >frame-relay, and you can't use "ip ospf network" statement. The only way
to
> >achieve routing between FR spokes is to use policy-routing.
> >
> >by the way, this is from Lab1 of ccbootcamp, so I'm not violating NDA.
NDA
> >is f...ing scary nowadays
> >
> >
> > >From: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
> > >Reply-To: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
> > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Subject: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> > >Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 12:59:50 -0500
> > >
> > >Is policy routing allowed for the lab?
> > >
> > >The reason I ask is because policy routing essentially bypass routing
> >table
> > >and it behave like static route, only it depends on source address
> >instead
> > >of destination address.
> > >
> > >Policy routing can solve a lot of problem, especially redistributing
VLSM
> > >OSPF routes into IGRP with same major network.
> > >
> > >What is your thought?
> > >
> > >Thanks!
> > >
> > >Ken Yeo
> > >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:45 GMT-3