From: Roman Rodichev (rodic000@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 20 2001 - 00:38:02 GMT-3
I think Step 8 (cant use ip ospf network) is solved by policy routing.
Frame maps are not needed for the routing to work, "ip ospf network" would
do frame map's job.
>From: "John Kaberna" <jkaberna@netcginc.com>
>To: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>, <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>,
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
>Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 20:27:46 -0700
>
>I think you are getting step 8 and step 11 confused.
>
>Step 8 (cant used ip ospf network) - solved by used ip ospf hello-interval
>
>Step 11 (cant use 2 frame maps on the spokes) - solved by using policy
>routing
>
>John Kaberna
>CCIE #7146
>NETCG Inc
>www.netcginc.com
>(415) 750-3800
>Fax: 750-3900
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>
>To: <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 7:51 PM
>Subject: RE: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
>
>
> > People, am I being stupid? I will take a look at that lab on Tuesday. I
> > clearly remember that they explicitly said not to use "ip ospf network"
> > statement.
> >
> > Yes, you guys are right that we weren't allowed to use "frame map"
> > statements on the spokes. And it's ok. That was not the point of the
>lab.
> > The point was that we couldn't use "ip ospf network multipoint"
>statement,
> > which would fix the entire scenario by creating /32 routes on the spokes
> > pointing to the hub. So since we couldn't do it, we had to create policy
> > routing that would send traffic to the hub manually.
> >
> > Am I right?
> >
> >
> > >From: Martin Duggan <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>
> > >Reply-To: Martin Duggan <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>
> > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: RE: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> > >Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 21:40:14 +0100
> > >
> > >Hi Roman
> > >
> > >My understanding of Lab1 was that you policy route as you are not
>permitted
> > >to add multiple frame relay map statements from spoke to spoke, you
>policy
> > >route so that the next hop is actually your hub ( when attempting to
>reach
> > >a
> > >spoke from a spoke )the hub is obviously aware of all spokes.
> > >
> > >Martin
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Roman Rodichev [mailto:rodic000@hotmail.com]
> > >Sent: 19 May 2001 21:13
> > >To: kenyeo@email.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> > >
> > >
> > >Ken, policy routing should be used when you can't achieve certain task
>with
> > >the routing protocol you have or WAN technology you are using. And of
> > >course, when you are asked to use it. Let's say you have multipoint
> > >frame-relay, and you can't use "ip ospf network" statement. The only
>way
>to
> > >achieve routing between FR spokes is to use policy-routing.
> > >
> > >by the way, this is from Lab1 of ccbootcamp, so I'm not violating NDA.
>NDA
> > >is f...ing scary nowadays
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
> > > >Reply-To: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
> > > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Subject: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> > > >Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 12:59:50 -0500
> > > >
> > > >Is policy routing allowed for the lab?
> > > >
> > > >The reason I ask is because policy routing essentially bypass routing
> > >table
> > > >and it behave like static route, only it depends on source address
> > >instead
> > > >of destination address.
> > > >
> > > >Policy routing can solve a lot of problem, especially redistributing
>VLSM
> > > >OSPF routes into IGRP with same major network.
> > > >
> > > >What is your thought?
> > > >
> > > >Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >Ken Yeo
> > > >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:45 GMT-3