From: Martin Duggan (Martin.Duggan@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 19 2001 - 17:40:14 GMT-3
Hi Roman
My understanding of Lab1 was that you policy route as you are not permitted
to add multiple frame relay map statements from spoke to spoke, you policy
route so that the next hop is actually your hub ( when attempting to reach a
spoke from a spoke )the hub is obviously aware of all spokes.
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Roman Rodichev [mailto:rodic000@hotmail.com]
Sent: 19 May 2001 21:13
To: kenyeo@email.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
Ken, policy routing should be used when you can't achieve certain task with
the routing protocol you have or WAN technology you are using. And of
course, when you are asked to use it. Let's say you have multipoint
frame-relay, and you can't use "ip ospf network" statement. The only way to
achieve routing between FR spokes is to use policy-routing.
by the way, this is from Lab1 of ccbootcamp, so I'm not violating NDA. NDA
is f...ing scary nowadays
>From: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
>Reply-To: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
>Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 12:59:50 -0500
>
>Is policy routing allowed for the lab?
>
>The reason I ask is because policy routing essentially bypass routing table
>and it behave like static route, only it depends on source address instead
>of destination address.
>
>Policy routing can solve a lot of problem, especially redistributing VLSM
>OSPF routes into IGRP with same major network.
>
>What is your thought?
>
>Thanks!
>
>Ken Yeo
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:45 GMT-3