From: Martin, Chris (chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 17 2000 - 02:36:02 GMT-3
yep thats correct
----- Original Message -----
From: "Himawan Nugroho" <nhimawan@id.ibm.com>
To: <chris@pacinter.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: Frame Relay questions
>
> I see,
>
> In that case, I believe the sub-interface will inherit the encap type from
> the physical
> If we only type encap frame in the physical int, I believe the
> sub-interface will get the cisco encap type.
>
> Regards,
> Himawan Nugroho
> Network Solutions Specialist
> IBM Global Services - Indonesia
> Voice : 62-21-5238897, Fax : 62-21-2512933
>
>
> chris@pacinter.net (Martin, Chris) on 05/17/2000 11:35:24 AM
>
> Please respond to chris@pacinter.net (Martin, Chris)
>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, Himawan Nugroho/Indonesia/IBM@IBMID
> cc:
> Subject: Re: Frame Relay questions
>
>
> try it, let me know, i think the encap under the serial interface is
> sufficient
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Himawan Nugroho" <nhimawan@id.ibm.com>
> To: "Martin, Chris" <chris@pacinter.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Frame Relay questions
>
>
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > AFAIK, cisco router use LMI autosense to identify the LMI type in FR
> > switch.
> > And if we only type: encapsulation frame-relay, the default type is
cisco
> > and if we want to use IETF we have to type: encap frame ietf
> >
> > Are you sure we don't have to add cisco or ietf when using
sub-interface?
> > hmm..I have to try in my lab..
> >
> > Regards,
> > Himawan Nugroho
> > Network Solutions Specialist
> > IBM Global Services - Indonesia
> > Voice : 62-21-5238897, Fax : 62-21-2512933
> >
> >
> > chris@pacinter.net (Martin, Chris)@groupstudy.com on 05/17/2000 10:34:30
> AM
> >
> > Please respond to chris@pacinter.net (Martin, Chris)
> >
> > Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> >
> >
> > To: "Sam Pilot" <sam_pilot@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject: Re: Frame Relay questions
> >
> >
> > Sam my comments are down below with a *** next to it
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Sam Pilot" <sam_pilot@hotmail.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:15 PM
> > Subject: Frame Relay questions
> >
> >
> > > Can someone explain the following questions to me
> > >
> > > 1) In serial interface config mode
> > > encapsulation frame-relay cisco | ietf
> > >
> > > Is "ietf" used to connect to a non-cisco router
> > *** YES thats what its for
> > >
> > > 2) frame-relay map ip X.X.X.X DLCINo broadcast cisco | ietf
> > >
> > > When would I use "ietf" or "cisco" in the map statement?
> > > Is it related to the frame relay encapsulation type?
> > *** yes it is related to the frame-relay type. However you wouldnt need
> to
> > add the ciso or ietf statement if you configured subinterfaces. This
> > command
> > is really dependant if you are in a partial or full mesh cloud.
> >
> > Also if you specify frame-relay encap cisco or ietf you do not need to
> add
> > those statements to your DLCI map statement above.
> >
> > HTH
> > Chris Martin
> > CCNP CCDP MCSE
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Sam
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:44 GMT-3