Re: Using Public Addresses Internally

From: Andrew (arousch@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 17 2001 - 11:59:08 GMT-3


   
Bruce,

Please tell me you are not in charge of any design that touches paying
customers ;^) And just a bean counter... :)

Anyway, this entire thread is OT

-A

andrew.rousch,ccnp.ccdp
.mailto:arousch@home.com
.

At 10:31 AM 5/17/01 -0400, Bruce Williams wrote:
>I need enough addresses to accommodate hundreds of customers, each will need
>hundred or so different networks and in these networks they will have over a
>hundred hosts. I might be able to accommodate that by subnetting 10.0.0.0
>and then if necessary subnetting 172.16.0.0 and then 192.168.0.0, but my
>boss believes it will be easier to use Class A space 1.0.0.0 to 126.0.0.0
>that way they can have a cookie cutter method of assigning IP addresses.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <andrew.2.shore@bt.com>
>To: <bruce@williamsnetworking.com>; <David.Halaska@getronics.com>;
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:20 AM
>Subject: RE: Using Public Addresses Internally
>
>
> > ?????? ever thought of subnetting ?
> >
> >
> > Andrew Shore
> > BTcd
> > IDC Technical Specialist
> > > ignite Content Hosting
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Williams [mailto:bruce@williamsnetworking.com]
> > Sent: 17 May 2001 15:12
> > To: Halaska, David; ccielab
> > Subject: Re: Using Public Addresses Internally
> >
> >
> > We need much more address space than that.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Halaska, David" <David.Halaska@getronics.com>
> > To: "'Bruce Williams'" <bruce@williamsnetworking.com>;
> > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:16 AM
> > Subject: RE: Using Public Addresses Internally
> >
> >
> > > Could you use the 10.x.x.x class A range that is reserved for private
>use?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bruce Williams [mailto:bruce@williamsnetworking.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:56 AM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Using Public Addresses Internally
> > >
> > >
> > > My company wants to use public addresses from the Class A range
> > internally.
> > > I
> > > realize the danger if these routes got advertised on the Internet, but
>is
> > > this
> > > something that is considered acceptable if it is carefully done to
>prevent
> > > the
> > > risk of these routes being propagated out on the Public Internet? These
> > > networks will be used to address equipment in a multitude of cellular
> > radio
> > > base stations around the country and they will only be connected to our
> > > network. There will central locations where users from the internet
>could
> > > access a database which will query these systems, but there will not be
>a
> > > direct internet connection. I would appreciate any advice on this.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Bruce Williams
> > > 215-275-2723
> > > bruce@williamsnetworking.com
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:43 GMT-3