From: Craig Hammer (Craig.Hammer@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 17 2001 - 11:58:51 GMT-3
Ah, wouldn't that be 16 million?
Craig Hammer
Senior Network Engineer
Parago, Inc.
972-538-3936
-----Original Message-----
From: chris@pacinter.net [mailto:chris@pacinter.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:29 AM
To: Bruce Williams; Halaska, David; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Using Public Addresses Internally
I dont think you need more addresses then 65 million bruce..
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Williams" <bruce@williamsnetworking.com>
To: "Halaska, David" <David.Halaska@getronics.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: Using Public Addresses Internally
> We need much more address space than that.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Halaska, David" <David.Halaska@getronics.com>
> To: "'Bruce Williams'" <bruce@williamsnetworking.com>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:16 AM
> Subject: RE: Using Public Addresses Internally
>
>
> > Could you use the 10.x.x.x class A range that is reserved for private
use?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Williams [mailto:bruce@williamsnetworking.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:56 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Using Public Addresses Internally
> >
> >
> > My company wants to use public addresses from the Class A range
> internally.
> > I
> > realize the danger if these routes got advertised on the Internet, but
is
> > this
> > something that is considered acceptable if it is carefully done to
prevent
> > the
> > risk of these routes being propagated out on the Public Internet? These
> > networks will be used to address equipment in a multitude of cellular
> radio
> > base stations around the country and they will only be connected to our
> > network. There will central locations where users from the internet
could
> > access a database which will query these systems, but there will not be
a
> > direct internet connection. I would appreciate any advice on this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bruce Williams
> > 215-275-2723
> > bruce@williamsnetworking.com
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:43 GMT-3