From: Chris Mott (cmott@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 17 2001 - 11:26:57 GMT-3
Agreed ... if the traffic is never destined for outside use, or not to be
advertised via BGP, why do it? Take RFC 1918 to the folks who are pushing
this and explain the benefits vs. detriments ... just my 10 phennig!
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Halaska, David
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:16 AM
To: 'Bruce Williams'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Using Public Addresses Internally
Could you use the 10.x.x.x class A range that is reserved for private use?
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Williams [mailto:bruce@williamsnetworking.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:56 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Using Public Addresses Internally
My company wants to use public addresses from the Class A range internally.
I
realize the danger if these routes got advertised on the Internet, but is
this
something that is considered acceptable if it is carefully done to prevent
the
risk of these routes being propagated out on the Public Internet? These
networks will be used to address equipment in a multitude of cellular radio
base stations around the country and they will only be connected to our
network. There will central locations where users from the internet could
access a database which will query these systems, but there will not be a
direct internet connection. I would appreciate any advice on this.
Thanks,
Bruce Williams
215-275-2723
bruce@williamsnetworking.com
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:43 GMT-3