From: Chris Mott (cmott@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 17 2001 - 11:28:52 GMT-3
10.x.x.x is 16 million+ addresses .. you need more than that? We did a
similar thing for another cellular company (to remain unnamed) and it worked
fine
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Bruce Williams
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:12 AM
To: Halaska, David; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Using Public Addresses Internally
We need much more address space than that.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Halaska, David" <David.Halaska@getronics.com>
To: "'Bruce Williams'" <bruce@williamsnetworking.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: Using Public Addresses Internally
> Could you use the 10.x.x.x class A range that is reserved for private use?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Williams [mailto:bruce@williamsnetworking.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:56 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Using Public Addresses Internally
>
>
> My company wants to use public addresses from the Class A range
internally.
> I
> realize the danger if these routes got advertised on the Internet, but is
> this
> something that is considered acceptable if it is carefully done to prevent
> the
> risk of these routes being propagated out on the Public Internet? These
> networks will be used to address equipment in a multitude of cellular
radio
> base stations around the country and they will only be connected to our
> network. There will central locations where users from the internet could
> access a database which will query these systems, but there will not be a
> direct internet connection. I would appreciate any advice on this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bruce Williams
> 215-275-2723
> bruce@williamsnetworking.com
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:43 GMT-3