From: Frank B (frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 12 2001 - 15:33:14 GMT-3
I don't have the book but I noticed the same thing in an example on the
Cisco page at:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/45.html
check example 3 "Ring to Ethernet over WAN"
I removed the "source-bridge ring-group 2000" command from router b and all
seemed to work fine, as expected. I could very well be overlooking
something though...any assitance is welcome.
In fact, PLEASE let me know if anyone finds there IS a reason for this
command in this type of scenario.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Virnoche, Phil
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 7:30 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Satterlee and Hutnick CCIE Practice lab kit - DLSW and Bridging
Group-
Has anyone else done this one? I COMPLETELY disagree with the configuration
for R5 and R1. Reference pages 366-367. I do not see any need for a
source-bridge ring-group statement on DLSW peers that are only hosting
ethernet segments. Isn't that what the beauty of DLSW+? .... terminating the
ring at the peer.... unlike RSRB?
Unless someone can explain why, I am calling BULLSHIT on these authors again
! (excuse my french)... This book is SOOOOO full of errors.... on the bright
side though it is making me have to prove my knowledge ( or lack there of
)....
Any thoughts????
Philip G. Virnoche
Sr. Network Engineer - AT&T Wireless
phone: 425.580.5239
cell: 206.601.3134
"HAM AND EGGS - A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a
pig."
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:40 GMT-3